Task Assessment List for Presidential Award

 

Preliminary organizer Points

Possible

 Peer Teacher
1. An appropriate list of criteria were selected

Comments:

 

      
2. Appropriate presidents were selected for comparison

Comments:

 

      
3. Information collected was accurate and appropriate

Comments:

 

      
4. Data was collected from credible sources

Comments:

 

      
5. Data were well-organized in chart form

Comments:

      

 

Final Organizer Points

Possible

 Peer Teacher
1. Group chose appropriate criteria for

examining the contributions of the selected president

Comments:

 

      
2. Information collected was accurate and appropriate

Comments:

 

      
3. Data was collected from credible sources

Comments:

 

      
4. Data were well-organized in chart form

Comments:

 

      
5. Group has selected effective quotes to present

Comments:

 

      
6. A logical conclusion was reached

based on evidence collected

Comments:

 

      

 

 

Multimedia Presentation Points

Possible

 Peer Teacher
1. Thesis was clearly stated

Comments:

 

      
2. Project was well organized

Comments:

 

      
3. Strong evidence supports choice of president

Comments:

 

      
4. Each point was supported by

appropriate and accurate details

Comments:

 

      
5. Group has selected effective quotes to present

Comments:

 

      
6. Multimedia elements helped convey the message and

were not distracting

Comments:

 

      
7. Conclusion was persuasive

Comments:

 

      
8. Sources were well-documented

Comments:

 

      
9. Mechanics of writing were followed: grammar, spelling, punctuation

Comments:

 

      
10. Group members worked effectively to produce the product

Comments:

 

      
11. Presentation: Group effectively communicated the

results of their research with their audience

Comments:

 

      
12. Group was clearly familiar with material. Speakers maintained

eye contact, spoke clearly and persuasively

Comments: